Exploring Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in Kalinga Province: Practices, Preservation, and Perspectives
RELIGION AND SOCIAL COMMUNICATION VOLUME 23, NO. 1 (2025)
ISSN 3057-0883 (ONLINE)
Author
George Canilao Tumbali
Abstract
This study delves into the traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of the Indigenous People of Kalinga, Philippines, while also examining similar practices and challenges faced by other indigenous communities worldwide. The study highlights the universal themes and unique adaptations of TEK across cultures, providing a broader perspective on the significance of traditional knowledge in addressing contemporary environmental issues. It aims to identify and document the traditional practices, rituals, and beliefs that demonstrate the community’s deep connection with nature and their efforts in sustainable resource management; it explores the challenges faced in preserving TEK, such as the impact of formal education, globalization, and modernization, and provide recommendations for safeguarding and promoting TEK among the Kalinga people for future generations. It uses a pure qualitative research method with interviews as the primary tool; the elders of the different Kalinga sub-tribes are the study participants. Ethical considerations were followed; the researcher sought the elders’ approval before being interviewed. The results of this study were also returned to them so they could concur with the translation of their answers.
The findings highlight the community’s profound reverence for nature, reflected in their cultural traditions and environmental stewardship practices. By advocating sustainable actions like refraining from burning and employing natural farming techniques, Kalinga communities contribute to climate resilience and biodiversity protection. Ultimately, this study seeks to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about the role of TEK in sustainable development and environmental stewardship, advocating for the integration of traditional knowledge with modern scientific approaches. Additionally, the study underscores the impact of formal education and globalization on Kalinga traditions, emphasizing the need to balance modernity with heritage preservation.Recommendations include involving youth in traditional activities, integrating old and new farming methods, documenting TEK, and incorporating it into the education curriculum to ensure longevity and relevance. This holistic approach aims to cultivate a sense of collective responsibility, sustainability, and environmental consciousness across Kalinga communities.
Keywords
Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), Kalinga Province, sustainable development goals, cultural preservation, environmental stewardship, Indigenous practices
References
Aclan, Eunice M., et al. “Alangan Mangyans’ Values That Shape Their Young Generations’ Thinking Skills, Technology Use, and Their Relationship to the Lowlanders: A Mini-Ethnographic Case Study.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (ICEBSH 2021), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press 570 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210805.236.
Adedeji, O. O., B. O. O. Ekundayo, and I. O. Olajide. “An Ethnobotanical Study of Plant Species Used for Medicine by the Eegun Indigenous Tribal Group of Lagos State, Nigeria.” Notulae Scientia Biologicae 10, no. 3 (2018): 318-27. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb10310306
Anacin, Emily, Enrique Oracion, and Ty Matejowsky. “Syncretism in Rituals and Performance in a Culturally Pluralistic Society in the Philippines.” The Social Science Journal 52, no. 1 (2015): 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.08.005
Berkes, Fikret, Johan Colding, and Carl Folke. “Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management.” Ecological Applications 10, no. 5 (2000): 1251–62. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
Fabricant, Daniel S., and Norman R. Farnsworth. “The Value of Plants Used in Traditional Medicine for Drug Discovery.” Environmental Health Perspective 109, Supplement issue 1 (2001): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s169
Filho, W. L., J. S. Pereira, E. Begotti, and A. L. S. Teles. “Impacts of Climate Change to African Indigenous Communities and Examples of Adaptation Responses.” Nature Communication 12 (2021): 6224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26540-0
Gómez‐Baggethun, Erik, Esteve Corbera, and Victòria Reyes-García. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Global Environmental Change: Research findings and policy implications.” Ecology and Society 18, no. 4 (2013): 72. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06288-180472
Halim, Che, Wan Nurul Mardiah Wan Mohd Rani, and Nurul Asma’ Mokhtar. “Examining Community Engagement in Heritage Conservation Through Geopark Experiences from the Asia Pacific Region.” Kajian Malaysia 35, supplement 1 (2017): 11–38. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.supp.1.2
Haq, S.M., et al. ”Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Habitat Restoration: Implications for Meeting Forest Restoration Challenges.” Journal of Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 19, no. 33 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00606-3
Hopping, Kelly A., Ciren Yangzong, and Julia Klein. “Local Knowledge Production, Transmission, and the Importance of Village Leaders in a Network of Tibetan Pastoralists Coping with Environmental Change.” Ecology and Society 21, no. 1 (2016): 25. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08009-210125
Ifrani, Fathul Achmadi Abby, Abdul Halim Barkatullah, Yati Nurhayati, and M. Yasir Said. “Forest Management Based on Local Culture of Dayak Kotabaru in the Perspective of Customary Law for a Sustainable Future and Prosperity of the Local Community.” Resources 8, no. 2 (2019): 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020078
Klein, Richard J. T. “Adaptation to Climate Change.” In Climate. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, edited by I. Linkov and T. Bridges, 157-68. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1770-1_9
Leo, Hendri, Joni Hartono, and Wahyu Sasongko. “A Description of Dayak Iban’s Traditional Knowledge on Customary Forest Management in West Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Earth and Environmental Science 940 (2021): 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/940/1/012074
Mukhopadhyay, P., and S. Roy. “Traditional Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation, Maintain Ecosystem Services and Livelihood Security in the Context of Climate Change: Case Studies from West Bengal, India.” Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography 6, no. 1-2 (2015): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766901.2015.11884752
Mumby, J., Peter, Iliana Chollett, Yves‐Marie Bozec, and Nicholas H. Wolff. “Ecological Resilience, Robustness and Vulnerability: How Do These Concepts Benefit Ecosystem Management?” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7 (2014): 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.021
Negi, Vikram S., Ravi Pathak, Shinny Thakur, Ravindra K. Joshi, Indra D. Bhatt, and Ranbeer S. Rawal. “Scoping the Need of Mainstreaming Indigenous Knowledge for Sustainable Use of Bioresources in the Indian Himalayan Region.” Environmental Management 72 (2023): 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01510-w
Ngidlo, Robert T. “Modern Farming Technologies: Impact on Farm Productivity and Food Security in the Rice Terraces of the Cordillera Region, Northern Philippines.” Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 4, no. 8 (2014): 913-921. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajea/2014/9202
Panda, T., Nirlipta Mishra, Bikram Pradhan, Shaik Rahimuddin, and Rajballav Mohanty. “Sacred Groves in Conservation of Biodiversity in Odisha.” The Holistic Approach to Environment 10, no. 1 (2020): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.33765/thate.10.1.2
Paneque‐Gálvez, Jaime, Nicolás Vargas-Ramírez, Brian M. Napoletano, and Anthony R. Cummings. “Grassroots Innovation Using Drones for Indigenous Mapping and Monitoring.” Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 6, no. 4 (2017): 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6040086
Pásková, Martina. “Can Indigenous Knowledge Contribute to the Sustainability Management of the Aspiring Rio Coco Geopark, Nicaragua?” Geosciences 8, no. 8 (2023): 277 https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8080277
Patterson, Heather, Ella Bowles, Susan Chiblow, Deborah McGregor, Cory Kozmik, and Jesse N. Popp. “Environmental and Socio-Cultural Impacts of Glyphosate-Based Herbicides: Perspectives from Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science.” Frontiers in Conservation Science 4 (2023):1186399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1186399
Renganathan, S., and M. Kral. “Digital Preservation of Language, Cultural Knowledge and Traditions of the Indigenous Semai.” SHS Web of Conferences 53 (2018): 02001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185302001
Rijoly, M. H. “How Ambonese Read: Challenges and Opportunities to Preserve Maluku Folklore and Culture.” Pejlac Journal 2, no. 1 (2022): 91–100. https://doi.org/10.30598/pejlac.v2.i1.pp91-100
Robinson, Melissa K., Christopher T. Rota, and Laura A. Dee. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Restoration Ecology: A Call to Listen Deeply, to Engage with, and Respect Indigenous Voices” Restoration Ecology 29, no. 4 (2021): e13381. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13381
Sarjono, Kadri, and Mohammad Fakhri. “The Sacredness of Communication in the Ngasuh Gumi Tradition of the North Lombok: An Ethnographic Analysis.” Jurnal Komunikasi 15, no. 1 (2023): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20414/jurkom.v15i1.7033
Seli, M, Y, M G Rindarjono, and Puguh Karyanto. “The Concept of Forest Natural Resources Conservation on Traditional Dayak Mualang Community.” Earth and Environmental Science 83 (2021): 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012087
Sharifian, Abolfazl, Álvaro Fernández‐Llamazares, Hussein T. Wario, Zsolt Molnár, and Mar Cabeza. “Dynamics of Pastoral Traditional Ecological Knowledge: A Global State-of-the-Art Review.” Ecology and Society 7, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-12918-270114
Singh, Sonia. “Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage Resources and Manuscripts: An Indian Government Initiative.” The Information Society 38, no. 4 (2012): 289–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035212463139
Sumarwati, Sumarwati. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge on the Slope of Mount Lawu, Indonesia: All about Non-Rice Food Security.” Journal of Ethnic Foods 9, no. 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-022-00120-z
Tengö, Maria, Eduardo S. Brondízio, Thomas Elmqvist, Pernilla Malmer, and Marja Spierenburg. “Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach.” AMBIO 43 (2014): 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3
Uprety, Bharat R., Mohan P. Devkota, and Krishna B. Shrestha. “Contribution of Traditional Knowledge to Ecological Restoration: Practices and Applications.” Ecoscience 19, no. 3 (2012): 225–37. https://doi.org/10.2980/19-3-3530
Vicerra, Miguel Paolo, and Jem R. Javier. “Tabi-Tabi Po: Situating the Narrative of Supernatural in the Context of the Philippines Community Development.” Manusya: Journal of Humanities 16, no. 2 (2013): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-01602001
Warta, Ketut. ”Tri Hita Karana and Natural Resources Exploring a Way How This Nature is Preserved and Potected in Bali and Lombok Islands.” Delhi Business Review 13, no. 2 (2012): 91-97.
Yahaya, Abdulai. “Indigenous Knowledge in the Management of a Community-Based Forest Reserve in the West District of Ghana.” Ghana Journal of Development Studies 9, no. 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v9i1.8
Zort, Çağın, Esra Karabacak, Şevket Öznur, and Gökmen Dağlı. “Sharing of Cultural Values and Heritage Through Storytelling in the Digital Age.” Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104121.
Pages 9-35
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62461/GCT101624
Submitted: August 17, 2024; Accepted: October 16, 2024; Published: January 10, 2025
© 2025 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
